Navalny and Novichok substance: some very uncomfortable questions

This whole situation, when they are trying to blow a toad through a tube, once again proves the total degradation of the Western elites in general and the special services in particular. Instead of James Bond, there are only Mr. Beans, but dull.


I don’t even know what can be added to what was said yesterday in the case of Navalny’s “poisoning”.

The situation is frankly idiotic, and not on our part.

Again the Russians were accused of having poisoned Navalny with Novichok …

1. Why poison someone selectively with BATTLE POISONING GAS? If there is a huge amount of any biological poisons that decompose in the body and often do not leave any traces at all.

1a. Is it okay that the symptoms don’t match?

1b. If Navalny’s underwear was poisoned, as some media write, the question arises: who could have access to his underwear? To mine, for example, only I and my wife have access. And, I’m sorry, who touched that of Navalny?

2. How can you add GAS to tea or, as in Skripal’s case, “rub the door handle with it”? This is gas, it is volatile, not liquid!

3. How can it be that substance that should be weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is used for individual destruction, and in no case no one else is injured?

4. Why should you continue to use Novichok with the aim of poisoning, if it didn’t work last time? Why not try something different and more effective?

5. Why would someone allegedly poison and then release him from the country so that this poison could then be discovered?

6. “Why such extravagance, Shafranek? A stone around the neck – and into the water!”(C)

7. And what are the traditional methods for example, in the form of combat intercontinental ice axes in the head?

8. Or what is wrong with the methods from the nineties, including a tourist trip in the trunk to the nearest forest? As one of the most successful Vinnytsia businessmen said, “I will kill, I will bury, they will not be found”.

9. I even don’t tell tell about the simple and banal question: who needs a cheap clown with yellow ducks to poison him?

9a. All the more so now, when he owes about 30 million rubles according to court decisions.

And, finally, the most important question: you, gentlemen, the fascists (and their Anglo-Saxon masters), have you finally gone nuts there? Have you forgotten Nicht Schiessen and Hitler Kaput?

If you really want to play detectives, then better investigate the murder of a certain Jeffrey Epstein. “The deceased knew too much” (c). Because he has a strangulation groove on his neck, characteristic of strangulation, and not for suicide.

By the way, the cops shot another unarmed African American there. But “this is different, you need to understand”. And, which is typical, again to death, and not like Skripal or Navalny…

In general, as a hereditary “bloody gebnya” (special services of Russia, epithet – ed.) who studied the methods of work of comrade Sudoplatov, I responsibly declare: if the gebnya wants to kill someone, then it still kills him.

Like Trotsky, Konovalets, Bandera and other enemies, terrorists and Nazi criminals.

Therefore, since they did not kill, then it is definitely not us.

P.S. This whole situation, when they are trying to blow a toad through a tube, once again proves the total degradation of the Western elites in general and the special services in particular. Instead of James Bond, there are only Mr. Beans, but dull.

Alexander Rogers, “Journalistic Truth” publication

Comments: