By Jean Périer
A report that a school in the town of Kunduz in northern Afghanistan was subjected to indiscriminate bombing by the so-called Western coalition came as no surprise for all those analysts who have been closely following the events that unravel in this Central Asian state. As it was announced by the Education Department Director of the Kunduz province, Janat Gul Nasiri, this latest air raid against civil infrastructure of Afghanistan resulted in human victims.
Reports about the mounting civilian death toll in Afghanistan due to the careless and outright criminal actions of US servicemen and their allies appear in the media quite often. However, much less often do we hear the Pentagon admitting its responsibility for those attacks, and when it does it usually takes it a long time to do so. The US military command in Afghanistan waited for more than two months to come to the conclusion that a total of 33 civilians were killed by US Air Force planes in the Kunduz province last November.
At the same time, according to the representatives of the Pentagon, those responsible for the incident will not be held responsible for their actions, since they somehow defending themselves from those civilians. As a result, yet another war crime has been written off as self-defense!
Among the string of similarly brutal incidents the most well-known one was the US air strike against a hospital run by the Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in the Kunduz province, that occurred on October 2015. Despite the apologies that Washington presented to the Afghan side, its military brass still believes that a half-hour bombing raid was an “unintentional event” that doesn’t qualify as a war crime.
At the beginning of the year The Intercept published a large article, which has been straightforwardly titled the Crimes of the SEAL Team 6. The article tells little about the heroism or professionalism of the servicemen of the American special forces unit SEAL Team 6, which the Hollywood and bestselling authors are so fond of. The authors of the above mentioned article took the courage to investigate the dark side of war – crimes that are being routinely committed by US servicemen. The investigation into SEAL Team 6 was conducted for two years and included 18 interviews with former and current soldiers and officers of the unit. The Intercept article is somewhat reminiscent of The New York Times piece on the same topic published back in 2015.
Under the pretext of taking DNA samples, according to the Intercept, the soldiers of SEAL Team 6 practically removed scalps of Afghans fighters during the first deployments in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The foreign fighters who suffered these V-shaped wounds were either killed in battle and later shot at close range or finished off with a security round while dying. Among members of SEAL Team 6, this practice of desecrating enemy casualties was called “canoeing.”
No investigation of those barbaric practices of the SEAL Team 6 has ever been conducted, so no serviceman has ever received some form of official punishment for these offenses. The worst what has ever happened to the soldiers that were engaged in such inhumane practices was a transfer to some other unit without any measure preventing from returning to SEAL Team 6.
However, US servicemen are not the only ones to commit war crimes in Afghanistan as numerous journalistic investigations show. The other day, the Australian media corporation ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation), due to leakage of classified documents from the Ministry of Defense, has begun releasing scandalous facts about how operations of the Australian special forces in Afghanistan were conducted. A series of articles published under the title of the Afghan Files has triggered a massive scandal both in Australia and the UK.
Judging by the documents, from 2009 to 2013, at least ten cases were reported when Australian special would open fire on unarmed Afghans, including children when they and their actions were verbally opposed.
In April 2013, Australian special forces would cut off the hands murdered Taliban fighters for no logical reason at all, it seems they were wanted some of “trophy” to take back home. The scandal erupted in 2013, but only now due to the leak of the above mentioned documents the details of those inhuman actions become clear.
The press and the society of Australia seem to agree that those latest leaks shed light on the culture of impunity, recklessness, and outright disrespect to the lives of Afghans that are now common among Western special forces operatives.
Moreover, according to a number of commentators, the environment of unpunished crimes, no matter how brutal they are, and the logics of “shoot first, ask questions later” that has been adopted by the Western coalition forces, results in the fact that ordinary Afghans start supporting the Taliban and its cause solely due to the hatred provoked in them by the Western military forces.
As allegations about the war crimes committed by American, British and Australian special forces start to pile up, one starts questioning the overall effectiveness of punitive raid that have become a common practice for Western special forces units.
After sixteen years of war in Afghanistan and hundreds, if not thousands, of the raids carried out by special forces have not put an end to the Taliban. Those raids fail to reduce the support this movement has been enjoying among the population, if fact, they’ve made the Taliban even more powerful. In 2002, the Taliban forces were believed to amount to seven thousand fighters, in 2016 the estimated number of militants fighting for its cause has surpassed twenty five thousand people. The continuous raids committed by Western special, in spite of the mounting death toll of the Afghan population, have not changed the course of the war.
As the number of war crimes committed by the US and its allies across the Middle East and Central Asia continue to grow, one can only wonder will the criminals be ever brought to justice?